Writing a story about the counterfactual to the bunker escape hatch idea.
Here is a link to the draft, and more details about it below.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyUABsIRJasQKQiFoS-O07veSYXR02knTl1o4ezh2kQ/edit?usp=sharing
What would happen, if a billionaire — grounded in reality, without ego — decided to put all of their wealth towards mitigating and adapting to global warming?
The story becomes a way to talk about the projects we should be taking on, along with an impetus for wealthy people to do it. The counterfactual of their bunker plan. (See below for explanation)
Anybody up for sharing input / feedback?
I cut a fair amount out to get to the point. And yet, the narrative has to be effective in pulling a person along for the journey, a rich person or a billionaire, to help them get to the point of realizing it and asking: "oh shit — what do we need to be doing today?" These are some of the things I'm trying to reconcile.
P.S. I know appealing to wealth isn't a generative strategy. And yet, I also know of wealthy people who are making a big difference — people giving to the Climate Emergency Fund like Abigail Disney, Jeremy Strong, Adam McKay. Fergie Chambers. Mackenzie Scott. Marlene Engelhorn, giving all of her $25M euro inheritance to a citizens council in Switzerland.
And I started thinking, given the urgency of where we're at and the need for larger mitigation and adaptation projects, the benefit to the future of more people starting to give their wealth today — recognizing, as so many of us others have, that there's nothing else to do. The thought is, this story could be a tool to support that. Help shift the paradigm, and give a positive orientation of where actions can go.
@Rushkoff@social.coop @ghostpanther@mastodon.social @abigaildisney@universeodon.com